This article examines conflictual jural relationships in which competing rights clash across private, social, and public spheres, offering a structured framework for resolving conflicts through duties, autonomy, and constitutional values.

This article examines self-regarding acts through the example of voluntary intoxication.

Join NLUO’s Constitutional Law Society for its 7th Double Credit Course on Law, Power & Privilege in Indian Constitutionalism. Online | Feb 1–22, 2026.

This article is Part III of the nine-part series “Jural Relationships in the System of Reciprocal Duties.”

This article is Part II of a nine-part series titled “Jural Relationships in the System of Reciprocal Duties.” While Part I laid the theoretical foundation by linking autonomy and duties towards oneself, this piece advances the discussion by examining non-conflictual jural relationships, particularly the absence of factual conflicts of rights through Hohfeld’s framework.

This article is Part I of a eight-part academic series titled “Jural Relationships in the System of Reciprocal Duties.” The series explores the philosophical and constitutional foundations of rights and duties, focusing on autonomy, will, and reciprocity in legal systems.

Authored by Dr. Iuris Alexander Espinoza Rausseo and Dr. Jhenny de Fátima Rivas Alberti.

Authored by Anurag Chauhan, one of the Co-founders.

Authored by Divija Manaktala, a 2nd-year student at Maharashtra National Law University, Mumbai