Search Results

right to personal liberty given to an arrested person, flowing out of Article 21 of the Constitution of India right to personal liberty given to an arrested person, flowing out of Article 21 of the Constitution of India Union of India, have ruled that the ability to be released on bond is a basic right. "In the matter of Athar Pervez v. For instance, the Supreme Court of India granted temporary release to Arvind Kejriwal during the Lok

The Preamble envisages India as a Sovereign, Socialist, Democratic, and Republic nation. Union of India[13] where the Supreme Court held that the words voluntary give up membership and resignation Vishwanathan v. Rajendra Singh Rana v. Zachilhu and Others, AIR 1993 SC 412. [13] Ravi S Naik v. Union of India, AIR 1994 SC 1558 [14] G.

The Society for Constitutional Law Discussion is organizing a workshop on “Indian Constitution in 2022 occasion of Republic Day i.e., 26th January, 2022 About the Workshop/ Concept Note The Supreme Court of India shall discuss the wider interpretation of the Constitution by the Apex Court and the relevance of the Indian Topic “Indian Constitution in 2022: Judicial Perspectives” General Details Date: January 26, 2022 Time

[iii] In the case of Romesh Thakur v. [ii] Sakal Papers v. Union of India, AIR 1962 SC 305: (1962) 3 SCR 842. [iii] Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) P. Ltd. v. Union of India, AIR 1986 SC 515 at 527: (1985) Scc641. [iv]Romesh Thakur v. the State of Madras, 1950 AIR 124, 1950 SCR 594.

Introduction Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India gives every citizen the right to freedom of The law of Sedition in India is affirmed under Chapter VI, “Offences against the State”, beneath Section contempt, or excites or attempts to excite disaffection towards the Government established by law in India led to slapping the charge of Sedition on Ramya on the basis that she should go to Pakistan and leave India as her statement was anti-national and, in a way, insulting to the people of India.

National Law University, Raipur Representational Image/ Source: Unsplash Introduction The gig economy in India These concerns are now pending adjudication at the Supreme Court in Indian Federation of App-Based Transport Workers v. Union of India & Ors.

In 2016, the Supreme Court, in its landmark judgment in   Nabam Rebia v. In a subsequent judgment in Keisham Meghachandra Singh v.  (para 5.22) and even the Election Commission of India   itself have also echoed this sentiment. Opposition leaders have often voiced their distrust in the Election Commission of India (ECI), arguing Vithalbhai Patel, India's first Indian Speaker in 1925, attempted to set a precedent of being impartial

[xi].Moreover, India being a welfare state, expounds an obligation upon the government to constantly Union of India & Ors. [iv]Article 21, Constitution of India, 1950. [v]Article 19(1)(d), Constitution of India, 1950. [viii]Supra v. [ix]Article 19(1)(e), Constitution of India, 1950. [x]Supra v. [xi]K. Chandru Vs. Union of India &Ors., W.P.(C) 11616/2015. [xiv]ICESCR, Art. 11(1). [xv]UDHR, Art. 25(1).

— Justice V. R. Krishna Iyer, former judge, Supreme Court of India [3] The Constitution of India contains certain provisions India’s stand on blocking re-entry to practice is desirable. References [1] R v Sussex Justices, (1924)1 KB 256 [2] Paul L. Supreme Court Of India, (2018) 8 SCC 396 [15] Ibid [16] Constitution of the U.S.A., Art. III

v. Time and again, the Supreme Court of India has confirmed the same. Supreme Court of India has applied this doctrine to various domains ranging from statutory laws to public In 1957, the Government of India set up the 2nd Pay Commission Committee, whose recommendations were The Supreme Court has confirmed the same in the case of Indian Aluminum Co Ltd v.

recordings have been held to be admissible as electronic evidence falling under the meaning of the Indian Also, in IMA v. Union of India, the Court went into the ambit of article 15(2) insofar it prohibits private discrimination In the case of Consumer Education and Research Centre (CERC) v. Union of India where the Court was riddled with the right to health of employees, it held that such a

recommendations were made for streamlined registration of foreign suppliers offering online gaming services in India The 'All India Gaming Federation' seeks clarification on these amendments. Impact of Changes on Tax Incidence Recent tax reforms in India's online gaming sector have sparked concerns India's imposition of a 28% GST on contest entry fees and 30% TDS on net winnings sets a harsh precedent India, as an emerging economy with significant digital prowess, risks hindering growth by neglecting