top of page

Search Results

185 results found for "Joseph Shine v. Union of India"

  • Actionable Claims in the GST Era: Impact on Tax Incidence and Recent Changes in Digital Gaming Services

    recommendations were made for streamlined registration of foreign suppliers offering online gaming services in India The 'All India Gaming Federation' seeks clarification on these amendments. Impact of Changes on Tax Incidence Recent tax reforms in India's online gaming sector have sparked concerns India's imposition of a 28% GST on contest entry fees and 30% TDS on net winnings sets a harsh precedent India, as an emerging economy with significant digital prowess, risks hindering growth by neglecting

  • The Ongoing Debate: Death Penalty in Modern Justice

    University (NFSU), Delhi Introduction The death penalty has always been a topic of global debate, and India India’s Position: The Impact of the Aparajita Woman and Child Bill, 2024 The proposed death penalty for Although India has always maintained the death penalty for crimes deemed exceptionally serious, this Furthermore, questions have been raised concerning the ability of India’s legal system to administer Moreover, the Supreme Court of the US, in the famous case of Roper v.

  • Unravelling The Complex Layers of Marriage Equality For Homosexuals

    Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University, Lucknow Introduction In a democratic country like India, The supporters of the petitions argue that as India already decriminalized homosexual relationships in So, should India legalize same-sex marriages or not? Violative of Article 19 Further, Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India guarantees all citizens (Para c. 87) In the case of NALSA v Union of India, recognition has been made that sex and gender are

  • The Passage of Agri Ordinance Bills Weakened the Cooperative Federalism & Annihilation of Democracy

    Union of India[5] that executive should refrain from using its legislative power recklessly in a malafide Also, In Union of India Vs. Union of India AIR SC 1918 (1994). [2] Dr. Pradeep Jain Etc Vs. Union Of India And Ors. Union of India AIR SC 710 (1982). [6] I.T.C. Ltd. Vs. State of Karnataka & Ors. AIR Kant 330 (2005). [7]Union of India Vs. Shri Harbhajan Singh Dhillon AIR SC 1061 (1972).

  • National Food Security Act: An Analysis

    Authored by Raj Krishna* & Sagarika Swapnil** Introduction The concern of food security in India is not Post-independence the situation did not improve as India relied a lot upon the food grains which they Court of India with a prayer of release of food stock for the purpose of welfare schemes. The state government is forced to buy food grains from the Food Corporation of India at a price above Conclusion and Suggestions The Covid-19 pandemic has turned the Indian as well as global economy upside

  • Balancing the Bench: A Case for Women Reservations in Higher Judiciary

    year law student at Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law, Punjab Background The Supreme Court of India The statistics of both courts, raise grave concerns about the diversity and inclusivity of the Indian The Indian higher judiciary, which essentially serves as the gatekeeper for upholding the principles In his dissenting judgment in Naresh v. Kraemer, 334 US 1 (1948); Budhan v.

  • The Prohibition of Child Marriage (Amendment) Bill, 2021: Raising the Bar or Raising the Barriers?

    A helpful example would be dowry laws in India. Union of India , citing eighteen as the ideal age of marriage. The Supreme Court in  Shafin Jahan  v . In 2018, the apex court affirmed through Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India , that consensual sex between consenting adults is a basic human and fundamental right

  • Basic Certificate Courses by Institute of Constitutional and Parliamentary Studies

    Certificate Course in Learning Mediation BCC-SVI: Basic Certificate Course in Starting New Ventures  in India like IIPA, ILI, ISTM, IILM etc., and other renowned institutions of higher education and learning in India Sabha Secretariats Officers (in-service/ superannuated) usually not below the rank of Director from Union Officers (in-service/ superannuated) usually not below the rank of Director from Election Commission of India , Comptroller-General of India, etc.

  • Legal Validity of Live-in Relationship

    Concept of Live-in Relationship The concept of a live-in relationship came to India in recent times. Live-in relation is considered in India as an outcome of modernization but it is not completely true. Live-In Relationship in India The concept of live-in relationships has spread throughout the whole world In India, there are 11 fundamental rights. Article 21 is one of them. the view that a live-in relationship is a personal choice of a person and also the constitution of India

  • Redefining Tribal Female Inheritance via the Supreme Court’s Landmark Decision

    . - The Supreme Court of India (Ram Charan & Ors. v. Sukhram & Ors. 2025)   In a recent landmark and socially revamping judgment of the Supreme Court of India equity, and is free from non-discrimination, bias, and prejudice, which are to be practised by all in India Hindu Succession Act, 1956 , particularly deals with succession and inheritance rights of Hindus in India This actually leaves tribal communities of India with no law of inheritance governance, until and unless

  • Misuse of UAPA, Delhi High Court Slaps State on Terror Tag

    Abstract When our pen starts running, we must write with great satisfaction that India enjoys the position Democratic nation in the world and has been given some fundamental rights under the constitution of India In the Judgment of Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan vs Union of India, the Hon’ble Supreme Court says that most primitive natural justice and procedural safeguards, This decision by the Supreme Court in the Union of India vs.

  • Status of Children Born Out of Live-in Relationship

    Balasubramanyam v. her marriage[5]; A child born out of the live-in relationship is entitled to maintenance under the Indian This can also be challenged under Article 32 of the Indian constitution. In the case of Bharatha Matha v. both are to be considered equal in the eyes of law would amount to a violation of Article 14 of the Indian

bottom of page