Search Results

his rights to express his opinions under the right to freedom of speech and expression as provided by Article went against its own liberal view of what can be constituted as contempt, in the case of Arundhati Roy[4] Shiv Shankar & Others, 1988 AIR 1208. [4]Arundhati Roy vs Unknown, AIR 2002. [5]Regina vs Police Commissioner

Supreme Court held that the Preamble is not a part of the Constitution and therefore not amendable under Article was never embraced in the Preamble by the initial framers, although the Directive Principles such as Article Article 368  stipulates that amendments to the Constitution have to be approved by a two-thirds majority

Article 21 of the constitution projects the obligation on the state to preserve life. Employees’ State Insurance Corporation[4] , that the right to protection of life and personal liberty provide their workmen with proper facilities and health opportunities as pledged and provided in part 4 life under Article 21 which forms the basic fundamental rights of the citizens. April 29, 2021; https://www.bbc.com/news/56858980 [3] 1989 AIR 2039 [4] (1996) 2 SCC 682 [5] The Print

Shivangi Pahuja, Legal Academician Link to Join: TECHNICAL SESSION: 4 | THEME: ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

It is argued in this article that the NALSA judgment blurs the line of distinction between horizontal Union of India, but leaving the phrase “backward classes” open-ended under Articles 15(4) and 16(4) ensured Union of India ((2014) 5 SCC 438), expanded the scope of Articles 15(4) and 16(4) of the Indian Constitution This expansive notion of Article 15(4) and 16(4) was further solidified in the Jat reservations judgment reservation for SC, ST and OBCs, where each of these groups has its own “separate” reservation under Article

requirements lie in the domain of Directive Principles of State Policy, like ‘Right to work’ under Article 41 and ‘Protection and improvement of environment and safeguarding of forests and wildlife’ under Article Article 37 spells out the bar to the justiciability of DPSP in the Constitution itself. The Court converted a non-justiciable issue into a justiciable one in the context of Articles 21 and 39-A is a mandate implicit in Articles 14 and 21.

guaranteed to every individual by the Constitution of India, and the same forms an integral part of Article Through the means of this article, the author aims to shed light on the recent Pegasus scandal, what 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution and the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21. Union of India (UOI) and Ors[4]. The State of U.P., 1963 AIR 1295. [4] Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.), supra note 1.

This article attempts to bring to the fore the pertinent fact that Sedition Laws have not been repealed One of the main vitiating factors is the contravention of Article 19 (1) (a) , which guarantees the right to freedom of speech and expression; according to research conducted by the media foundation Article

that a woman’s right to make a reproductive choice is also a dimension of her “personal liberty” under Article

The author has secured 11th Rank in Article Writing Competition organised by The Society For Constitutional Can 124A Be A Reasonable Restriction Under Article 19(2)? A restriction is considered reasonable when it aligns with the interests outlined in Article 19(2), and Hence, this section must be abrogated as it is against contravenes with the provisions of Article 19 Therefore, this section must be abrogated as it contravenes with the provisions of Article 19 (1)(a)

However, 10 fundamental duties were added under Article 51A of the Indian Constitution under the 42nd A.I.I.M.S. & Ors case stated, “In case of doubt or choice, peoples wish as manifested through Article Conclusion This blog recommends that Article 51A of the Indian constitution be made binding and something By making Article 51A justiciable, the state can use its contents, such as upholding of cultural values

Union of India   in 2017 restated the recognition of the right to privacy as a fundamental right under Article Article 12   of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948 (UDHR)   and Article 17 of the International Article 21 safeguards the "Right to life and personal liberty" as part III of the Indian Constitution right to be forgotten" as a separate provision, despite its acknowledgment as a crucial element within Article data, the ‘Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023’ fortifies the “right to privacy” guaranteed by Article