21[iv]& freedom of movement under Article 19(1)(d)[v] of the constitution. permanent housing accommodation to the poor in the housing scheme undertaken by it under Article 19( UDHR clearly states under Article 25 (1)[xv] that, basic standard of living includes housing. [iv]Article 21, Constitution of India, 1950. [v]Article 19(1)(d), Constitution of India, 1950. [ix]Article 19(1)(e), Constitution of India, 1950. [x]Supra v. [xi]K. Chandru Vs.

The author has secured 3rd Rank in Article Writing Competition organised by The Society For Constitutional traverses through subsequent matters of right to go abroad in Maneka Gandhi, discussing the scope of Article In doing so, the article contributes to a richer comprehension of the complex tapestry of Indian constitutionalism Maneka Gandhi objected the move and alleged a violation of her fundamental rights under Articles 14 and It simultaneously challenged Articles 14, 19, and 21, revealing a remarkable and wide-ranging example

📝 Editorial Note: This article is Part I of a eight-part academic series titled “ Jural Relationships This article is based on: Espinoza Rausseo, A., & Rivas Alberti, J. (2026).

📝 Editorial Note: This article forms part of a nine-part academic series titled “J ural Relationships This article is based on: Espinoza Rausseo, A., & Rivas Alberti, J. (2026).

📝 Editorial Note: This article is Part II of a nine-part series titled “ Jural Relationships in the This article is based on: Espinoza Rausseo, A., & Rivas Alberti, J. (2026).

The bonds should be encashed within 15 days or else they will go directly to the prime minister's relief It was held that: Electoral bonds are violative of Article 19 (a) of the constitution. has a different set of provisions about the conduct of elections which is mentioned in part XV from Articles Article 19 also mentions the freedom to form associations which gives the freedom to form political parties

4. contract in which one party renounces their entire freedom for the benefit of the other is null and void. 4. This article is based on: Espinoza Rausseo, A., & Rivas Alberti, J. (2026).

The Indian Apex Court invoked Article 142 of the Constitution and ruled that there has been an inordinate delay on the part of the Governor in deciding the plea of remission of Perarivalan under Article 161 However, there was an inordinate delay on the part of the Governor in deciding the plea under Article The Apex Court ruled that the Governor is empowered under Article 161 of the Constitution to decide this The Court, by this judgment, has reaffirmed the fact that the right to seek mercy under Articles 72 or

In Gauri shankersharma v. state[4]Three police officers were booked for the custodial death in the period has stated that these techniques constitute the ‘Cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment’ in Context of Article five-custodial-deaths-in-india-daily-says-report/article31928611.ece last accessed at 24.07.2020 at 11.17PM [2]ibid [3]https://indianexpress.com/article explained-tamil-nadu-police-custodial-torture-father-son-killed-thoothukudi-6479190/ last accessed at 24.07.2020 at 11.59 PM [4]

Sub-themes Right to Privacy under Article 21, in the light of the Digital Data Protection Act 2023 Safeguarding Constitutional Rights in the Era of Technology Abrogation of Article 370 Understanding the essence of Contact Information In case of any queries, do not hesitate to contact us on articles@tscld.com.

capital punishment' and 'International human rights law'. ' Universal Declaration of Human Rights ' under Article recognises the 'right to life', and ' International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights' (ICCPR)  under Article However, it is evident from Article 6 that it allows capital punishment to those countries that have The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights' (ICCPR) , by virtue of its article 6 (2) mandates highlighted in the discourse on international human rights law, namely the right to life as guaranteed by Article

List II of the constitution, giving states exclusive authority to legislate on the state, curtsey of Article State of Kerala[4] case, it was observed that the Basic Structure of the constitution cannot be altered State of Rajasthan AIR SC 2616 (2001). [4] Kesavananda Bharati Vs.