Search Results

Union of India (UOI) and Ors.[1], the Supreme Court of India held that the Right to Privacy is guaranteed Sharma & Ors. v. Satish Chandra, DM, Delhi & Ors.[2]and Kharak Singh v. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Ors. v. Union of India (UOI) and Ors[4]. regulations in India. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Ors. v. Union of India (UOI) and Ors., AIR 2017 SC 4161. [2] M.P.

University (NFSU), Delhi Introduction The death penalty has always been a topic of global debate, and India India’s Position: The Impact of the Aparajita Woman and Child Bill, 2024 The proposed death penalty for Although India has always maintained the death penalty for crimes deemed exceptionally serious, this Furthermore, questions have been raised concerning the ability of India’s legal system to administer Moreover, the Supreme Court of the US, in the famous case of Roper v.

Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University, Lucknow Introduction In a democratic country like India, The supporters of the petitions argue that as India already decriminalized homosexual relationships in So, should India legalize same-sex marriages or not? Violative of Article 19 Further, Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India guarantees all citizens (Para c. 87) In the case of NALSA v Union of India, recognition has been made that sex and gender are

Union of India[5] that executive should refrain from using its legislative power recklessly in a malafide Also, In Union of India Vs. Union of India AIR SC 1918 (1994). [2] Dr. Pradeep Jain Etc Vs. Union Of India And Ors. Union of India AIR SC 710 (1982). [6] I.T.C. Ltd. Vs. State of Karnataka & Ors. AIR Kant 330 (2005). [7]Union of India Vs. Shri Harbhajan Singh Dhillon AIR SC 1061 (1972).

year law student at Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law, Punjab Background The Supreme Court of India The statistics of both courts, raise grave concerns about the diversity and inclusivity of the Indian The Indian higher judiciary, which essentially serves as the gatekeeper for upholding the principles In his dissenting judgment in Naresh v. Kraemer, 334 US 1 (1948); Budhan v.

Authored by Raj Krishna* & Sagarika Swapnil** Introduction The concern of food security in India is not Post-independence the situation did not improve as India relied a lot upon the food grains which they Court of India with a prayer of release of food stock for the purpose of welfare schemes. The state government is forced to buy food grains from the Food Corporation of India at a price above Conclusion and Suggestions The Covid-19 pandemic has turned the Indian as well as global economy upside

A helpful example would be dowry laws in India. Union of India , citing eighteen as the ideal age of marriage. The Supreme Court in  Shafin Jahan  v . In 2018, the apex court affirmed through Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India , that consensual sex between consenting adults is a basic human and fundamental right

Certificate Course in Learning Mediation BCC-SVI: Basic Certificate Course in Starting New Ventures  in India like IIPA, ILI, ISTM, IILM etc., and other renowned institutions of higher education and learning in India Sabha Secretariats Officers (in-service/ superannuated) usually not below the rank of Director from Union Officers (in-service/ superannuated) usually not below the rank of Director from Election Commission of India , Comptroller-General of India, etc.

The Supreme Court of India has sought a response on the above issue of arbitrary executive exercise by Furthermore, the authors argue that the above exercise is inconsistent with India’s obligations under The Supreme Court of India in the case of Saghir Ahmad v. This exercise also violated India’s international obligations, as the ongoing arbitrary practices are By ignoring its obligations under various international conventions, India is losing its credibility

Concept of Live-in Relationship The concept of a live-in relationship came to India in recent times. Live-in relation is considered in India as an outcome of modernization but it is not completely true. Live-In Relationship in India The concept of live-in relationships has spread throughout the whole world In India, there are 11 fundamental rights. Article 21 is one of them. the view that a live-in relationship is a personal choice of a person and also the constitution of India

. - The Supreme Court of India (Ram Charan & Ors. v. Sukhram & Ors. 2025)   In a recent landmark and socially revamping judgment of the Supreme Court of India equity, and is free from non-discrimination, bias, and prejudice, which are to be practised by all in India Hindu Succession Act, 1956 , particularly deals with succession and inheritance rights of Hindus in India This actually leaves tribal communities of India with no law of inheritance governance, until and unless

Abstract When our pen starts running, we must write with great satisfaction that India enjoys the position Democratic nation in the world and has been given some fundamental rights under the constitution of India In the Judgment of Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan vs Union of India, the Hon’ble Supreme Court says that most primitive natural justice and procedural safeguards, This decision by the Supreme Court in the Union of India vs.