Directive Principles Of State Policy Abstract In a politically charged and ever-changing society, the Indian Directive Principle of State Policy (DPSP) in Part IV and the Fundamental Rights (FR) in Part III of the Indian The Indian Constitution's framers prioritized fundamental rights over directive principles. between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy cases under the Constitution of India

were legally recognised in the Judgement of the National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) v Union of India Union of India, the court laid down the integrated due process doctrine. Union of India (2017) gave the test of doctrine of Proportionality by laying down its four prongs. Welfare policies in India do not mandate a medical certificate for transgender individuals. Union of India, where Justice Deepak Misra highlighted the doctrine of progressiveness, which ultimately

Associate Editor at The Society For Constitutional Law Discussion (TSCLD) Supreme Court of India Introduction A seven-judge constitution bench of the Supreme Court of  India by its 4:3 judgment in Aligarh Muslim Under Article 30 of the Indian Constitution, minorities whether linguistic or religious, have a r ight Article 30 of the Indian Constitution equips minorities based on both language and religion with the The Supreme Court of India has clarified the objectives behind the inclusion of Article 30 as a fundamental

bearer bonds that can be purchased by any company or individual from the branches of the State Bank of India transparency, the political parties have to disclose their bank accounts to the Election Commission of India AITC (All India Trinamool Congress) is second and then Congress. Union of India The Supreme Court on 15th February 2024 passed a judgment that the electoral bonds are The Supreme Court on 11th March dismissed the application of the State Bank of India for the extension

(Hons.) in the year 2026 from Chanakya National Law University, Patna Constitution of India Introduction Union of India, the Supreme Court held that federalism is part of the Constitution's basic structure. Union of India, the Supreme Court held that the powers conferred on the appointed constitutional heads To preserve the power balance between the Centre and the states, India should move towards structural India’s Constitution is based on trust in its leadership.

[i] As a result, the Supreme Court of India was asked to decide upon the constitutionality of the communication Union of India. Union of India, Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1031/2019 available at https://indiankanoon.org/doc/82461587 /cases/bhasin-v-union-of-india/ [v] Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India, Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1031/2019 ,available at https://indiankanoon.org/doc/82461587

Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University, Lucknow Abstract In India, the right to marry remains a contentious This blog post explores the ongoing debate in India regarding the fundamental status of the right to Union of India  reignited the debate. The Evolving Nature of India’s Constitution and the Current Legal Position The Indian Constitution is However, the recent judgement has set back the fight for marriage equality in India.

Authored by Darshit Agarwal, a 2nd-year law student at National Law University, Delhi Supreme Court of India Union of India and Pragya Prasun v. (RBI), the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI), etc. brings a major change to the current legal framework and the public culture of India.

Authored by Harsh, a law student at Hidayatullah National Law University, Raipur Supreme Court of India Introduction Article 361  of the Indian Constitution provides that the President of the Union of India Latin maxim "The King Can Do No Wrong" being incorporated in Section 306(1)  of the Government of India Secretary of State for India  and in N. Nagendra Rao and Co. v. While DD Basu’s commentary on the Constitution of India does mention a list of offences that have been

National Law Institute University, Bhopal Source: Centre for Financial Accountability Introduction  India History of Sub-Class Reservation in India The debate over sub-class reservation is not new. Union of India & Ors , wherein the court allowed to sub-classify the backward classes and held that based Union of India , classification for a limited purpose was held permissible under Article 14 ; however of AIIMS Delhi at almost every level, which is known as one of the top educational institutions in India

Supreme Court of India Introduction  Even after the introduction of the word “secular” via the 42nd Amendment the Supreme Court to build a temple in its place, and a spate of petitions before various Courts in India Justice Shah took a conservative view that the Constitution of India was merely a continuation of the Government of India Act, 1935 and other colonial laws; and the Supreme Court was a mere successor of Even in India, in the case of In Re: Article 370 of the Constitution , Justice S.K.

3rd year students at DNLU, Jabalpur respectively The Supreme Court in the case of Supriyo v Union of India However, it is at the Parliament’s discretion to accept or reject the concept constitutionally. References [1] Sudhir Krishnaswamy, Democracy and Constitutionalism in India: A Study of the Basic Structure