Search Results

History of the Homosexuals in India Historians have long argued that pre-colonial Indian society did Citizens believe in the union of marriage but unfortunately, there are many people in our country who The case of Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India decriminalised homosexuality and abrogated section 377 of the Indian penal code which Supreme Court unanimously struck down the law that prohibited interracial marriages in Loving v.

Article 1 of the Constitution says “Union of States” which means that India is a union and states are Under India's Supremacy Clauses, federal law takes precedence over state law regarding both Union List In the case of Devika Biswas vs Union of India , the Supreme Court in a PIL held that Population control Narayan Dev v. State of Orissa . India follows a quasi-federal system where power is divided between the Union (central) government and

Steel Authority of India .   However, the scope of this provision was challenged in India Cement Ltd v. This centripetal bias is a hallmark of India’s federalism, where the Union’s stronger position leads Steel Authority of India, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the independence of Indian States within their Union of India , where the Supreme Court emphasised that investors require a stable and predictable

  The supreme law of the country is the Constitution of India. engaged in deliberations in the case titled RIT Foundation vs The Union of India , [2022 SCC Online Supreme Court: In September 2022, the Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling in the case titled X v. , which are the following: Independent Thought vs Union of India: In this case , the Supreme Court held RIT Foundation vs Union Of India (2019): Delhi High Court directed   the government to consider amending

Union of India, have indicted such legislations, underlining the state's obligation to ensure social In the matter of Harsh Mander v. Union of India , the Delhi High Court decriminalised begging and reiterated the responsibility of the In Vishal Pathak v. Union of India  (2020), the petitioner sought the decriminalisation of begging and the removal of the

Authored by Aashi Goyal, a 3rd-year law student at National Law School of India University, Bangalore Part, unless the context otherwise requires, “the State’’ includes the Government and Parliament of India and the Legislature of each of the States and all local or other authorities within the territory of India or under the control of the Government of India.” that have the authority to enforce, restrict and protect the fundamental rights of the citizens of India

It was held by Radhakrishnan J. in NALSA v Union of India as “ No restriction can be placed on one’s Puttaswamy v Union of India , where Chandrachud J. stated that the liberty of an individual to decide Aruna Roy & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors . that “ Even if there are differences of opinion in certain areas, people have dictating the dress code in educational institutions, which could lead to a serious religious divide in India

Union of India   in 2017 restated the recognition of the right to privacy as a fundamental right under Puttaswamy v. Union of India . Union of India , which revolved around Aadhaar,  a government initiative providing a unique identification Union of India & Ors . The lawsuit seeks to uphold Indian residents' data and “right to privacy.”  Puttaswamy v. Union of India case.” 

The case of Bilkis Yakub Rasool v. Union of India ( Bilkis Bano Case’) The Rape incident took place on March 3, 2002, after Bilkis and her denied the right to vote, which is the most basic right and most important one given to citizens of India The Supreme Court of India has laid down various factors for granting remission in Laxman Naskar v. Further, in 2006, SC in Epuru Sudhakar v.

The Supreme Court’s (SC) judgement   in “ Association for Democratic Reforms v Union of India (2024)” Under the Electoral Bond Scheme, such bonds can be purchased by any Indian citizen or a registered Indian party which garnered more than 1% vote in previous polls can cash it out at the specified State Bank of India an immediate cessation of the issuance of bonds under EBS and instructed the Election Commission of India , which analysed the data of political funding between FY 2004-05 and FY 2010-11, the top receiver Indian

Authored by Kunal Parihar, a 3rd-year law student at National Law School of India University, Bangalore Introduction In a unanimous decision in Association For Democratic Reforms vs Union Of India, 2024  on Corporate Donors v. Donors: Unraveling the Constitutional Implications When delivering the judgment, the Chief Justice of India Considering the considerable control of the state over the State Bank of India, it is not difficult for

In McFall v. The judgment of Shabnam Hashmi vs Union of India  provided adoption as a  Fundamental Right. Key Case Laws on The Aspect of Surrogacy In India Baby Manjhi Yamada vs Union of India In this instance Ikufumi Yamada and his wife, travelled to India for surrogacy purposes. Puttaswamy vs Union of India The court determined that requiring individuals to obtain and present a