Search Results

Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 violated Articles 14 and 19 of the Indian Union of India , which mandates clear guidelines when imposing restrictions upon freedom of speech and Ultimately, the evolving landscape of freedom of speech and expression in India requires careful consideration Union of India AIR 2015 SC 1523. [2]  S. Rangarajan v. P. Jagjivan Ram 1989 SCR (2) 204. [3] K.S. Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 1.

In the years following its enactment, the anti-defection law in India emerged as a toothless tiger. violates the basic structure of the Constitution, the rule of law and principles of natural justice being constitutionally Even in that situation, the court exemplified the trust in the Speaker’s office, which is constitutionally authority to adjudicate anti-defection proceedings can also be assigned to the Election Commission of India Assigning this role to the Election Commission in India would ensure that political considerations do

Until 1935, the British ruled India with a unitary system of government, but the Government of India Unlike the USA, India is not a model federal state as in the case of India the unitary state was turned Union of India, [xv] a nine-judge bench enunciated that the Indian Constitution is federal. [x] The Constitution of India, Article 249. [xii] The Constitution of India, Article 356 [xiii] AIR 1962 SC 1406.

organised by The Society For Constitutional Law Discussion The evolution of the Basic Structure concept in India The Basic Structure Doctrine is a legal principle in some countries, most notably India, that considers Union of India, which formally held Secularism to be a part of the Basic Structure. Modern secularism in India now encompasses the process of emancipating social and cultural institutions Union of India case had its roots in a highly contentious context. During Prime Minister V.P.

Union of India  held that “the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 is not limited to Domestic Violence Against Men: An Insight into the Figures and Statistics In India, where the Legislature In India, despite the data  present on domestic violence against men, people are still under an impression Union of India , adultery  was decriminalised citing violation of Article 14  as one of the grounds.  protected under Articles 1, 2, 7 & 12 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948 , of which India

not many resources that cover the idea of active euthanasia and how it might benefit a nation like India This article aims to explain what euthanasia is and its different aspects, further the Indian perspective The Supreme Court of India has previously rendered a judgment on this matter that it should remain illegal reasons and leaves no stone unturned to cover all the perspectives as to why it should be legalised in India

Constitution’s Silence The Constitution of India does not have a mechanism by which an elected member Coalition Governments The scheme under the Parliamentary System of Governance in India is such that the The Right to Recall may tend to deepen further the sense of instability that already exists in India First Past the Post System in India The ‘First Past the Post System’ coupled with the ‘Right to Recall In a densely populated nation like India, the threshold for the number of signatures needed to start

The Historical Context: An Unfree Climate of Constitutional Change From June 1975 to March 1977, India India’s experience adds complexity to the idea of ‘socialist.’ In India, however, secularism has developed differently. Union of India  (2002), the Court reaffirmed that Indian secularism is not atheistic and allows for a This is not a plea against welfare economics or secularism, both of which are essential for India.

particularly highlighted the issue of raids on BBC offices after the BBC launched the documentary “India India is a democratic country where freedom of speech and expression is considered a fundamental right In India, Romesh Thappar v. The Supreme Court of India struck down Section 66A of the IT Act and declared it unconstitutional. Union of India. In Anuradha Bhasin v.

Authored by Aditya Maheshwari, a 2nd-year law student at National Law School of India University, Bangalore Nehru feared that that could lurch India towards ‘balkanisation’ (ultimate disintegration) .   , the federal system with its strong Union has contributed to the preservation and consolidation of India ’s integrity  despite many separatist movements that have taken place/are taking place in India. , intense communal strife and a violent subjugation of the Nizam’s insurgency right in the heart of India

In India, the Digital Personal Data Protection Act (“DPDPA”) is the latest and most significant legislation The right to privacy has been recognized and expanded by the Supreme Court of India in several landmark Union of India, Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India, or Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India. Union of India and Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, have expanded its scope and recognition.

Authored by Kunal Parihar, a 3rd-year law student at National Law School of India University, Bangalore Union of India, the petitioners challenged the constitutional validity of a 2023 amendment to the Information In light of this, it becomes imperative to examine the constitutionality of the amended Rule 3(1)(b)( Government or its authorised officers to block public access to any information in the interest of India's Union of India, the Supreme Court ruled that legitimate expectations can only be overridden in the public