Search Results

Rule 3(b) of the Kerala Hindu Places of Public Worship (Authorization of Entry) Rules, 1965[4][5], used s right to profess and propagate any religion of their choice, guaranteed to every individual under Article On September 28, 2018, in a 4:1 majority judgment, the Supreme Court bench ruled in favor of the petitioners [1]Rahul, freedom Religion and Sabrimala Judgement,http://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-418 entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practice and propagate religion [4]

the world and has been given some rights in terms of freedom of speech and expression enshrined under Article , reversal of the burden of proof, and circumvention of protection under the Constitution of India (Articles 14, 21, 22), UDHR (Article 10), and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Article 21 and may only use it as a remedial measure if there is already a violation of Article 21. However, if future constitutional courts can often read about the robust protection of Article 21 in

It was well seen in the sensational Arushi Talwar’s case[4] where the media went deranged speculating sexual exploitation of blind girls in school was filed before the Supreme Court on the basis of an article This article was first published in the E-Magazine “Let me Speak" of TSCLD. State Of Florida, 328 U.S. 331 (1946) [3] (1996) 6 SCC 466 [4] 2011 (4) ALJ 682 [5] Jethmalani, Ram, Mahesh & Biswajit Bhattacharya eds ,Gyan Publishing House 1999) [6] (2004) 4 SCC 158 [7] J.

Introduction Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India gives every citizen the right to freedom of However, on the basis of Article 19(2), which recognises the State powers, reasonable restrictions can Although, Sedition is not mentioned as a ground in Article 19(2) on which restrictions may be imposed Now, in the constitutional legality question of Article 19(1) (a) arising in Kedar Nath v. Hence, it is not violative of Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution read with Article 19(2).

Anjali Kumari & Utkarsh Aryan, 4th year law students at Chanakya National Law University, Patna This article [4] The data analysis firm received the data of American voters in partnership with an Oxford professor An Anthropologist’s Look at Big Data and Political Campaigning’ (2021) 3 Public Anthropologist 119 [4] article=5833&con> accessed 21 November 2023 [5] Wagner K, “Here’s How Facebook Allowed Cambridge Analytica H and Krogerus M, ‘The Data That Turned The World Upside Down’ (2017) VICE <https://www.vice.com/en/article

21[iv]& freedom of movement under Article 19(1)(d)[v] of the constitution. permanent housing accommodation to the poor in the housing scheme undertaken by it under Article 19( UDHR clearly states under Article 25 (1)[xv] that, basic standard of living includes housing. [iv]Article 21, Constitution of India, 1950. [v]Article 19(1)(d), Constitution of India, 1950. [ix]Article 19(1)(e), Constitution of India, 1950. [x]Supra v. [xi]K. Chandru Vs.

The author has secured 3rd Rank in Article Writing Competition organised by The Society For Constitutional traverses through subsequent matters of right to go abroad in Maneka Gandhi, discussing the scope of Article In doing so, the article contributes to a richer comprehension of the complex tapestry of Indian constitutionalism Maneka Gandhi objected the move and alleged a violation of her fundamental rights under Articles 14 and It simultaneously challenged Articles 14, 19, and 21, revealing a remarkable and wide-ranging example

In Gauri shankersharma v. state[4]Three police officers were booked for the custodial death in the period has stated that these techniques constitute the ‘Cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment’ in Context of Article five-custodial-deaths-in-india-daily-says-report/article31928611.ece last accessed at 24.07.2020 at 11.17PM [2]ibid [3]https://indianexpress.com/article explained-tamil-nadu-police-custodial-torture-father-son-killed-thoothukudi-6479190/ last accessed at 24.07.2020 at 11.59 PM [4]

The Indian Apex Court invoked Article 142 of the Constitution and ruled that there has been an inordinate delay on the part of the Governor in deciding the plea of remission of Perarivalan under Article 161 However, there was an inordinate delay on the part of the Governor in deciding the plea under Article The Apex Court ruled that the Governor is empowered under Article 161 of the Constitution to decide this The Court, by this judgment, has reaffirmed the fact that the right to seek mercy under Articles 72 or

The bonds should be encashed within 15 days or else they will go directly to the prime minister's relief It was held that: Electoral bonds are violative of Article 19 (a) of the constitution. has a different set of provisions about the conduct of elections which is mentioned in part XV from Articles Article 19 also mentions the freedom to form associations which gives the freedom to form political parties

Sub-themes Right to Privacy under Article 21, in the light of the Digital Data Protection Act 2023 Safeguarding Constitutional Rights in the Era of Technology Abrogation of Article 370 Understanding the essence of Contact Information In case of any queries, do not hesitate to contact us on articles@tscld.com.

List II of the constitution, giving states exclusive authority to legislate on the state, curtsey of Article State of Kerala[4] case, it was observed that the Basic Structure of the constitution cannot be altered State of Rajasthan AIR SC 2616 (2001). [4] Kesavananda Bharati Vs.