Search Results

[iii] In the case of Romesh Thakur v. [ii] Sakal Papers v. Union of India, AIR 1962 SC 305: (1962) 3 SCR 842. [iii] Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) P. Ltd. v. Union of India, AIR 1986 SC 515 at 527: (1985) Scc641. [iv]Romesh Thakur v. the State of Madras, 1950 AIR 124, 1950 SCR 594.

Introduction Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India gives every citizen the right to freedom of The law of Sedition in India is affirmed under Chapter VI, “Offences against the State”, beneath Section contempt, or excites or attempts to excite disaffection towards the Government established by law in India led to slapping the charge of Sedition on Ramya on the basis that she should go to Pakistan and leave India as her statement was anti-national and, in a way, insulting to the people of India.

[xi].Moreover, India being a welfare state, expounds an obligation upon the government to constantly Union of India & Ors. [iv]Article 21, Constitution of India, 1950. [v]Article 19(1)(d), Constitution of India, 1950. [viii]Supra v. [ix]Article 19(1)(e), Constitution of India, 1950. [x]Supra v. [xi]K. Chandru Vs. Union of India &Ors., W.P.(C) 11616/2015. [xiv]ICESCR, Art. 11(1). [xv]UDHR, Art. 25(1).

v. Time and again, the Supreme Court of India has confirmed the same. Supreme Court of India has applied this doctrine to various domains ranging from statutory laws to public In 1957, the Government of India set up the 2nd Pay Commission Committee, whose recommendations were The Supreme Court has confirmed the same in the case of Indian Aluminum Co Ltd v.

In 2016, the Supreme Court, in its landmark judgment in   Nabam Rebia v. In a subsequent judgment in Keisham Meghachandra Singh v.  (para 5.22) and even the Election Commission of India   itself have also echoed this sentiment. Opposition leaders have often voiced their distrust in the Election Commission of India (ECI), arguing Vithalbhai Patel, India's first Indian Speaker in 1925, attempted to set a precedent of being impartial

recordings have been held to be admissible as electronic evidence falling under the meaning of the Indian Also, in IMA v. Union of India, the Court went into the ambit of article 15(2) insofar it prohibits private discrimination In the case of Consumer Education and Research Centre (CERC) v. Union of India where the Court was riddled with the right to health of employees, it held that such a

Union of India (UOI) and Ors.[1], the Supreme Court of India held that the Right to Privacy is guaranteed Sharma & Ors. v. Satish Chandra, DM, Delhi & Ors.[2]and Kharak Singh v. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Ors. v. Union of India (UOI) and Ors[4]. regulations in India. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Ors. v. Union of India (UOI) and Ors., AIR 2017 SC 4161. [2] M.P.

recommendations were made for streamlined registration of foreign suppliers offering online gaming services in India The 'All India Gaming Federation' seeks clarification on these amendments. Impact of Changes on Tax Incidence Recent tax reforms in India's online gaming sector have sparked concerns India's imposition of a 28% GST on contest entry fees and 30% TDS on net winnings sets a harsh precedent India, as an emerging economy with significant digital prowess, risks hindering growth by neglecting

University (NFSU), Delhi Introduction The death penalty has always been a topic of global debate, and India India’s Position: The Impact of the Aparajita Woman and Child Bill, 2024 The proposed death penalty for Although India has always maintained the death penalty for crimes deemed exceptionally serious, this Furthermore, questions have been raised concerning the ability of India’s legal system to administer Moreover, the Supreme Court of the US, in the famous case of Roper v.

Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University, Lucknow Introduction In a democratic country like India, The supporters of the petitions argue that as India already decriminalized homosexual relationships in So, should India legalize same-sex marriages or not? Violative of Article 19 Further, Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India guarantees all citizens (Para c. 87) In the case of NALSA v Union of India, recognition has been made that sex and gender are

Authored by Raj Krishna* & Sagarika Swapnil** Introduction The concern of food security in India is not Post-independence the situation did not improve as India relied a lot upon the food grains which they Court of India with a prayer of release of food stock for the purpose of welfare schemes. The state government is forced to buy food grains from the Food Corporation of India at a price above Conclusion and Suggestions The Covid-19 pandemic has turned the Indian as well as global economy upside

Union of India[5] that executive should refrain from using its legislative power recklessly in a malafide Also, In Union of India Vs. Union of India AIR SC 1918 (1994). [2] Dr. Pradeep Jain Etc Vs. Union Of India And Ors. Union of India AIR SC 710 (1982). [6] I.T.C. Ltd. Vs. State of Karnataka & Ors. AIR Kant 330 (2005). [7]Union of India Vs. Shri Harbhajan Singh Dhillon AIR SC 1061 (1972).