Search Results
171 results found for "Article 15(4)"
- Cash For Vote: Decoding The Contours of Parliamentary Privileges In Light of Sita Soren Judgment
In India, Articles 105 and 194 of the Constitution deal with the powers, privileges and immunities of Article 105(1) guarantees freedom of speech in the Parliament. Freedom of speech under Article 105(2) is not subject to limitations imposed by Article 19(2) but is only subject to Article 121 and rules governing the procedure of parliament. Article 105 (4) extends the afore-said privileges to those who have a right to speak and take part in
- Implementation of a Uniform Civil Code: Boon or a Bane?
Devangi Chandak, a 3rd-year Law Student at the School of Law, Christ University, Bengaluru Introduction Article while technically such violations are taken into cognizance by the High Courts and Supreme Court under Articles non-interventionist’approach and concluded that personal laws do not qualify as ‘laws in force’ under Article Although customs were covered under the ambit of Article 13(3)(b), there is no logical rationale behind Conflict with Article 25 One of the prima facie issues that arise over the implementation of the UCC
- Right To Recall Elected Representatives in India: A Utopia
Articles 102, 173, 243V etc., of the Constitution specify the grounds on which an elected representative There is no specific mention of no confidence motion in the Indian Constitution, though Article 75 of
- Women’s Representation in Parliament: Analysing the 106th Amendment Act’s Role
Article 334A has been introduced to specify that the seats reserved through amendment in the articles first census and by virtue of this provision will cease to have effect on the expiration of a period of 15 Post-census and Delimitation: As per the amendment in article 334A, the delimitation in Lok Sabha is The amendment substituted “2000” in articles 55, 81, 82, 170, 330, 332 with “2026”. Hence, the focus needs to shift from scrutiny to correct implementation of the Act for the first 15 years
- Analysing the Nature of Private Property: Dissecting the Property Owners Association v. State of Maharashtra Judgement
19(1)(f) to a constitutional right under Article 300A . Article 39 clauses (b) and (c) are protected under Article 31C, which states: “ 31C . The legal principle establishes that laws conflicting with Articles 14 and 19 are protected under Article The appellant contested this presumption, contending that the judicial annulment of Section 4 of the has to comply with conditions precedent in Article 300A.
- A Precautionary Measure?: The Demarcation of Separation of Power Between Judiciary and Legislature
The article states that “The state shall take steps to separate the judiciary from the executive in the In Article 53(1), the President of India is vested with the executive functions of the nation. Similarly, Article 154(1) vests executive power in the Governor. State of Karnataka, JT 2002 (4) SCC 572, the case was that the Appellant was working as an Electrical The court herein decided that pertaining to clause (4) of Article 329A the decision was given in accordance
- Secularism: A Study in the light of the Constitution of India
25 to 30 and Article 51A. Article 15(2) prohibits not only the State but also the private individuals from making discrimination Article 25 confers particular rights on all persons, while Article 26 guarantees certain rights only Article 26 is subject to public order, morality, and health, while Article 25 is subject to public order Article 27 guarantees freedom as to the payment of taxes for the promotion of any particular religion
- State or Mate? Unravelling the Effects of P K Biswas
UOI, which had held that CSIR is not a State under Article 12 . 32 and Article 226 . Supreme Court is approached under Article 32. This leads to a rather absurd conclusion that Article 12 merely controls Article 32 and not the Fundamental Hence, the distinction being drawn by the courts between Article 32 and Article 226 amounts to being
- Exploring The Intricacies of Euthanasia: A Comprehensive Constitutional and Judicial Review
Article 21 of The Indian Constitution with a Broader Application Every person is born with some basic Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, made way back in 1950, is all about giving people the freedom Canada [2016] SCC 4 (CanLll) case, the Supreme Court of Canada struck down the prohibition against physician-assisted Union of India [2011] 4 SCC 454 (SC) case, and Common Cause a registered society v. Union of India [2011] 4 SCC 454 (SC) recognised passive euthanasia without specific legislation, providing
- Scandalizing the Court
Ram Manohar Lohia National Law University, Lucknow Article 129 and Article 215 of the Indian Constitution In this article, we will delve into the meaning of scandalising the court and how our judiciary has dealt cases like in Meghalaya where the State High Court held the Shillong Times Editor for contempt when an article ble Supreme Court has held that contempt power of court is within the reasonable restriction given in Article
- Unveiling the Veil: Assessing Corporate Donor Privacy in Electoral Funding
In a unanimous decision in Association For Democratic Reforms vs Union Of India, 2024 on February 15 donations by corporations, violating the right to information of voters regarding political funding under Article protects informational privacy which, is needed to safeguard freedom of political affiliation under Article This interpretation is consistent with constitutional intent, as confining Article 19 rights solely The freedom of political affiliation, encompassed within Article 19, is inherently a facet of freedom
- Is Hijab Ban in Educational Institutions Unconstitutional?
In this article, given the backdrop of events, the author supports the wearing of the hijab in educational Augmenting the Freedom of Expression and Religious Choice Article 19 (1) (a) of the Indian Constitution placed on one’s personal appearance or choice of dressing, subject to the restrictions contained in Article Essential Religious Practices (ERP) is irrelevant to the dispute as the protection is sought under Article 25, and the expulsion violated the tenets of Article 25.












