Search Results

Introduction The relation between Union and States is a very important topic in the constitution of India In Indian constitution the relation between union and state has been defined under three heads namely 1950, art 249 and 250 [4] Constitution of India 1950, art 263 [5] Constitution of India 1950, art 265 Gopalan v. State of Madras (1958) 2 MLJ 117 [7] Constitution of India 1950 art 298 A [8] ITO v. of India 1950, art 285

Dhanoa v. Union of India, wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court upheld the validity of both notifications, citing Article Seshan v. Union of India, the Supreme Court upheld the “majority opinion's superiority” provision, affirming its Union of India, a PIL was submitted to the Hon'ble Supreme Court by the petitioner, contesting the procedure

Union of India and Pragya Prasun v. Union of India (one filed by a 100% blind lawyer and the other filed by an acid-attack victim, respectively (RBI), the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI), etc. Physical Impairment v.

National Law Institute University, Bhopal Source: Centre for Financial Accountability Introduction  India A turn came with the judgement of   Indra Sawhney v. Union of India & Ors , wherein the court allowed to sub-classify the backward classes and held that based Nakara v. Union of India , classification for a limited purpose was held permissible under Article 14 ; however

University, Lucknow Analysing the Nature of Private Property Introduction The right to property in India Union of India & Ors , Waman Rao v. Union of India  and Sanjeev Coke Manufacturing Company v. Union of India  case) survives in the Constitution after an amendment to the provision by the Forty-Second Union of India , even after the 42nd amendment was struck down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the Minerva Union of India Observation The majority neutralised the precedential weight of the  Mafatlal judgment

In countries like India, the constitution plays a crucial role in addressing inequities, biases, and In the case of Justice Puttaswamy (retd) vs Union of India ,  which is also known as the right to privacy Whereas in the case of the National Legal Service Authority (NALSA) VS Union of India , the judgment Union of India, section 377 was decriminalised, which was about the same-sex relationship between adults The Sabrimala Saga: In the case of the Indian Young Lawyers' Association and Ors. v.

In doing so, it misses an opportunity to display true gender inclusivity within one of India’s biggest Hotel Association of India (2007) , the Court struck down a provision prohibiting women from working Union of India (2018) , “constitutional morality prevails over societal morality,” which applies especially Union of India (2014) , the Constitution assures equality, dignity and autonomy for all individuals, In Indian Young Lawyers Association v.

Union of India (“NALSA judgement”). portion of the community currently engages in, like begging and sex work, has been criminalized in India In India, Vertical reservation is particularly for the reservation for the underprivileged people belonging In Indira Sawhney v Union of India, (“Indira Sawhney”), Supreme Court provided a 50% cap on reservations organisation dedicated to the rights of transgender persons and sexual minorities, in the case of Sangama v.

In India, the Digital Personal Data Protection Act (“DPDPA”) is the latest and most significant legislation Puttaswamy v. Union of India, Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India, or Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India. Puttaswamy v. Union of India and Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, have expanded its scope and recognition.

Union of India  held that “the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 is not limited to Domestic Violence Against Men: An Insight into the Figures and Statistics In India, where the Legislature While in Vishaka & Ors v. Shine v. Union of India , adultery  was decriminalised citing violation of Article 14  as one of the grounds. 

Hotel Association of India held that personal autonomy and self-expression are protected under Article Union of India, gender identity was recognized as one of the most fundamental aspects of life and every It was said that the continued discrimination against the transgender community in India is contrary Union of India, the Hon’ble Court held that the right to privacy is a fundamental right under Art. 14

Constitution recognises the right to freedom of speech as a fundamental right, extending it to all citizens of India Article 19(2) provides the parameters for the same, which include, “sovereignty and integrity of India In the landmark case of Shreya Singhal v. Union of India , the Supreme Court answered this question of reasonable restrictions in the context of Union of India .